<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WiMax vs. LTE: LIVE in NYC &#8211; NOVEMBER 15, 2010 (finally )</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goingwimax.com/wimax-vs-lte-live-in-nyc-november-15-2010-finally-11084/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goingwimax.com/wimax-vs-lte-live-in-nyc-november-15-2010-finally-11084/</link>
	<description>WiMAX news, wimax opinions, 4G conversations and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:17:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Debreziner</title>
		<link>http://www.goingwimax.com/wimax-vs-lte-live-in-nyc-november-15-2010-finally-11084/comment-page-1/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Debreziner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingwimax.com/?p=11084#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>I guess WiMAX vs LTE will be a capacity play in the US. Even if the peak and average rates from 10MHz FD-LTE will be around twice as fast as 10MHz TDD WiMAX there should be at least around 4 times the number of WiMAX towers as compared to LTE towers (driven by frequency and coverage). So Sprint should have a least double the capacity as compared to Verizon plus the option to turn on a second carrier (which Verizon does not due to lack of spectrum). Assuming the coverage of 2.5GHz will provide a good indoor user experience (which could be critical in certrain urban areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess WiMAX vs LTE will be a capacity play in the US. Even if the peak and average rates from 10MHz FD-LTE will be around twice as fast as 10MHz TDD WiMAX there should be at least around 4 times the number of WiMAX towers as compared to LTE towers (driven by frequency and coverage). So Sprint should have a least double the capacity as compared to Verizon plus the option to turn on a second carrier (which Verizon does not due to lack of spectrum). Assuming the coverage of 2.5GHz will provide a good indoor user experience (which could be critical in certrain urban areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debreziner</title>
		<link>http://www.goingwimax.com/wimax-vs-lte-live-in-nyc-november-15-2010-finally-11084/comment-page-1/#comment-2639</link>
		<dc:creator>Debreziner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingwimax.com/?p=11084#comment-2639</guid>
		<description>I guess WiMAX vs LTE will be a capacity play in the US. Even if the peak and average rates from 10MHz FD-LTE will be around twice as fast as 10MHz TDD WiMAX there should be at least around 4 times the number of WiMAX towers as compared to LTE towers (driven by frequency and coverage). So Sprint should have a least double the capacity as compared to Verizon plus the option to turn on a second carrier (which Verizon does not due to lack of spectrum). Assuming the coverage of 2.5GHz will provide a good indoor user experience (which could be critical in certrain urban areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess WiMAX vs LTE will be a capacity play in the US. Even if the peak and average rates from 10MHz FD-LTE will be around twice as fast as 10MHz TDD WiMAX there should be at least around 4 times the number of WiMAX towers as compared to LTE towers (driven by frequency and coverage). So Sprint should have a least double the capacity as compared to Verizon plus the option to turn on a second carrier (which Verizon does not due to lack of spectrum). Assuming the coverage of 2.5GHz will provide a good indoor user experience (which could be critical in certrain urban areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News about 4G-LTE Wire issue #48 &#124; 4GLTEWIRE.com</title>
		<link>http://www.goingwimax.com/wimax-vs-lte-live-in-nyc-november-15-2010-finally-11084/comment-page-1/#comment-2633</link>
		<dc:creator>News about 4G-LTE Wire issue #48 &#124; 4GLTEWIRE.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 03:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingwimax.com/?p=11084#comment-2633</guid>
		<description>[...] of choice for 4G. There is WiMax to contend with. &#8230;and more&amp;nbsp  more&#8230;    WiMax vs. LTE: LIVE in NYC – NOVEMBER 15, 2010 (finally ) &#8211; Going WiMax &#8211; goingwimax.com 07/02/2010 Tech Gadgets Web (blog)WiMax vs. LTE: LIVE in NYC – NOVEMBER [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of choice for 4G. There is WiMax to contend with. &#8230;and more&amp;nbsp  more&#8230;    WiMax vs. LTE: LIVE in NYC – NOVEMBER 15, 2010 (finally ) &#8211; Going WiMax &#8211; goingwimax.com 07/02/2010 Tech Gadgets Web (blog)WiMax vs. LTE: LIVE in NYC – NOVEMBER [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AriZoldan (Ari Zoldan)</title>
		<link>http://www.goingwimax.com/wimax-vs-lte-live-in-nyc-november-15-2010-finally-11084/comment-page-1/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>AriZoldan (Ari Zoldan)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goingwimax.com/?p=11084#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>http://www.goingwimax.com/wimax-vs-lte-live-in-nyc-november-15-2010-finally-11084/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.goingwimax.com/wimax-vs-lte-live-in-nyc-november-15-2010-finally-11084/" rel="nofollow">http://www.goingwimax.com/wimax-vs-lte-live-in-nyc-november-15-2010-finally-11084/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Unknown: failed to open stream: Permission denied in <b>Unknown</b> on line <b>0</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Unknown: failed to open stream: Permission denied in <b>Unknown</b> on line <b>0</b><br />
<br />
<b>Fatal error</b>:  Unknown: Failed opening required '0ff' (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/tmp:/usr/local/lib/php:/root/ZendGdata-1.11.1/library') in <b>Unknown</b> on line <b>0</b><br />
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
